
In 2025, Tatari and Simulmedia are two of the most recognized TV advertising platforms, each taking a distinct approach to convergent TV. Tatari emphasizes a convergent TV approach across Linear, CTV and online video, measurement-first performance, transparent pricing, and self-serve tools for advertisers that treat TV like a digital performance channel. Simulmedia focuses on scale, audience reach, and cross-channel optimization, leveraging its TV+ platform and Skybeam for CTV campaigns. This comparison outlines how each platform performs across channels supported, measurement and attribution, ease of use, cost transparency, and ROI potential, helping marketers choose the best partner for their goals.
Read more
In 2025, performance-driven marketers expect television to match the precision of digital advertising. This in-depth comparison of Tatari vs. TV Scientific examines how each platform approaches TV advertising—spanning inventory, targeting, measurement, and ROI. Tatari unifies linear and streaming with outcome-based (business-centric KPIs) attribution and next-day performance reporting, while TV Scientific focuses on programmatic CTV campaigns. The analysis highlights which platform best fits new and experienced advertisers, offering insights for brands and agencies choosing between full-funnel convergent TV and pure CTV marketing.
Read more
Tatari and The Trade Desk both enable data-driven TV advertising, but they differ in focus and transparency. The Trade Desk is a programmatic DSP built for digital media, while Tatari is purpose-built for TV buying and measurement across linear, CTV, and OLV. Tatari offers direct publisher access, transparent pricing, and advanced attribution through incrementality and modeled ROAS. For advertisers seeking measurable outcomes and accountability in TV, Tatari delivers the strongest performance and control in 2025.
Read more
How do you prove a TV ad led to someone walking into a store days later? Saatva teamed with Tatari to crack the code, and the answer upends how retailers think about attribution.
Read more
Compare Tatari and MNTN to discover why Tatari leads in transparent, data-driven TV advertising across both linear and streaming channels. While MNTN offers quick, self-serve CTV campaigns, Tatari empowers brands to scale with precision, advanced measurement, and measurable ROI.
Read more
Pay-for-performance TV sounds great, but it's typically more spin than science. Flawed attribution, inflated results, and hidden methodologies mean advertisers may be overpaying. Want to know what’s really happening? Let’s break it down.
Read more
We discuss the complexities of TV measurement, highlighting flaws in approaches like Verified Attribution and advocating for a nuanced blend of methods, emphasizing the importance of embracing complexity in advertising attribution.
Read more
Tatari developed a view-through attribution metric designed, and optimized, solely for TV using TV-specific device graph data and proprietary methodologies.
Read more
No matter how meticulously a survey is crafted, it will always inherently be prone to error. Learn how Tatari solves this problem with a highly accurate mechanism for estimating TV lift.
Read more
TV ads produce a significant delayed response that traditional attribution models don't always capture. To accurately measure the delayed responses of a linear or streaming TV ad, advertisers need to consider these three things.
Read more